Make vs Zapier: which one to choose for automating your small business

Make vs Zapier: for most small businesses, Make offers more power for less money, and Zapier stays the easiest way to get started fast. That’s the short answer. But the full answer depends on your volume, your budget, and who’s going to maintain the system. So here’s the honest comparison, from someone who spends his weeks in both tools. No hidden commission: neither one pays me.

Two tools, one job

Make and Zapier do the same job: they connect your tools so data flows on its own. A form filled out on your site creates the contact in your customer tracking system, sends the welcome email, adds the follow-up task. In short, everything moves, and you haven’t touched a thing.

Zapier calls this small scenario a “Zap.” Make calls it a “scenario.” Same logic either way: one trigger, then a chain of actions.

Make vs Zapier: the price

First, both bill by usage: every step that runs consumes credits. But the bill doesn’t climb at the same speed. At equal volume, Make or Zapier can cost you anywhere from the same amount to three times more, and it’s almost always Make that comes out cheaper.

Pricing changes often, so I won’t paste a rate table here: check the Make and Zapier websites yourself when you’re ready to choose. Bottom line: at low volume, the difference is negligible; at high volume, it can fund a vacation.

Make vs Zapier: the simplicity

Zapier wins here. Its interface walks you through step by step, you fill in the fields, and your first Zap is running in ten minutes. That’s its real strength: anyone on the team can read and edit a simple automation.

Make, on the other hand, takes a bit more learning. You build a visual diagram, with bubbles connected to each other. But that diagram gives you a full view of the process: conditions, loops, branches. In other words: Zapier reads like a list of instructions, Make like an architect’s blueprint.

Complex cases, and the third contender

On integrations, Zapier connects more apps, especially niche North American tools. Make covers fewer overall, but it handles tricky scenarios better: transforming data, managing multiple branches, repeating an operation across an entire list.

And then there’s n8n, the third contender. Open source, self-hostable, popular when data is sensitive or volume explodes. That said, it’s the most technical of the three: I rarely recommend it as a first tool.

The real question isn’t the tool

Here’s a consultant’s secret: choosing between Make or Zapier matters less than the clarity of your process. Once you understand the logic, you can rebuild it in any tool. But a fuzzy process stays fuzzy, no matter which platform runs it.

So before you even create your account, document what you want to automate. We’ve written before about the number one mistake when automating a process: starting too soon, before the process is actually clear. A bad process in a good tool just creates mess faster.

My verdict as a consultant

Just starting out, small volume, and you want your team to stay in control? Go with Zapier. Got volume, branching scenarios, a budget you’re watching closely? Go with Make: it’s my default choice for the small businesses we work with. And if your data is sensitive or your volume gets huge, look at n8n, with someone technical on board.

Finally, if you’d rather have someone else choose, build and maintain all of this for you, reach out to us. Deciding between Make or Zapier is our daily bread: we’ll tell you which one fits your case, in twenty minutes.

Frequently asked questions

About the author

Edouard Vilver · Co-founder of Meriaky

Software engineer with 15 years of experience, including more than 7 years at the National Bank of Canada, where he rolled out electronic signatures and migrated systems to the cloud. Today, he helps small businesses automate their client follow-up and repetitive tasks with AI.

His LinkedIn profile